| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 14 | |
| 2. |  | MOLINA, F.; BLANCO, P.H.; DE LA PAVA, K. LOAIZA; VILLALBA, M.; VARGAS, J.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; ESCALANTE, F.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F. Nuevos cultivares Clearfield. In: Terra, J. A.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H. (Eds.) Arroz 2019. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2019. p. 77-80. (INIA Serie Técnica; 250)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 4. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación multi ambiental de híbridos HIAAL. In: Zorrilla, G.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H. (Eds.) Arroz 2017. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2017. p. 24-26. (INIA Serie Técnica; 233) HIAAL: Consorcio Híbridos de Arroz para América Latina.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 5. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación avanzada de cultivares de calidad americana - E5. In: Zorrilla, G.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H. (Eds.) Arroz 2017. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2017. p. 18-20. (INIA Serie Técnica; 233)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 6. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación avanzada de cultivares Clearfield. In: Zorrilla, G.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H. (Eds.) Arroz 2017. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2017. p. 21-23. (INIA Serie Técnica; 233)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 7. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; PEREIRA, A.L.; CASTILLO, J.; SALDAIN, N.E.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F.; FERREIRA, A.; SOSA, B. Nuevos cultivares de arroz para el sistema CLEARFIELD® INIA CL212 E INIA CL244. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2017, no.51, p.20-24. (Revista INIA; 51)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 9. | | PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M. Evaluación de cultivares aromáticos. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap 3, p. 28 (INIA Serie de Actividades de Difusión; 765)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 10. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación de cultivares de calidad americana - E5 Y E4. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap. 3, p. 22-24. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 765)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 11. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación de cultivares de calidad americana - E6. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap. 3, p. 19-21. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 765)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 12. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M.; ESCALANTE, F. Evaluación de cultivares Clearfield. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap. 3, p. 25-27. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 765) Acceso a publicación y presentación oral.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 13. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; SILVERA, W.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M. Evaluación de cultivares de calidad americana. ln: [JORNADA ANUAL] ARROZ-SOJA, 2015, Treinta y Tres, UY. Resultados experimentales 2014-2015. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2015. Cap. 3, p. 10-12. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 748)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 14. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; SILVERA, W.; VARGAS, J.; VILLALBA, M. Evaluación de cultivares Clearfield. ln: [JORNADA ANUAL] ARROZ-SOJA, 2015, Treinta y Tres, UY. Resultados experimentales 2014-2015. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2015. Cap. 3, p. 13-15. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 748)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 14 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BLUMETTO, O.; RUGGIA, A.; DALMAU, A.; ESTELLÉS, F.; VILLAGRÁ, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. DALMAU, IRTA (Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentáries); F. ESTELLÉS, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV); A. VILLAGRÁ, IVIA (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias). |
|
Título : |
Behavioural characterisation of Holstein steers in three different production systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2015, volume 56, Issue 10, pages 1683-1692. |
|
DOI : |
10.1071/AN15078 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 25 January 2014 / Accepted 30 April 2015 / Published online 26 August 2015. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to increase along the day in all treatments, while ?eating hay? increased along the day within Group T1, but decreased within Groups T2 and T3. It is concluded that the management conditions associated with the systems that were studied produced different behavioural patterns in the steers. Grazing behaviour is important for the animals, and the permanent or restricted possibility to perform it, determined by the production system, meant that the patterns of other behaviours changed to give priority to pasture intake. MenosABSTRACT.
The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEHAVIOUR; CATTLE; FREE-RANGE SYSTEMS; WELFARE. |
|
Thesagro : |
COMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL; GANADO BOVINO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02867naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1053934
005 2019-10-09
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1071/AN15078$2DOI
100 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
245 $aBehavioural characterisation of Holstein steers in three different production systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
500 $aArticle history: Received 25 January 2014 / Accepted 30 April 2015 / Published online 26 August 2015.
520 $aABSTRACT. The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to increase along the day in all treatments, while ?eating hay? increased along the day within Group T1, but decreased within Groups T2 and T3. It is concluded that the management conditions associated with the systems that were studied produced different behavioural patterns in the steers. Grazing behaviour is important for the animals, and the permanent or restricted possibility to perform it, determined by the production system, meant that the patterns of other behaviours changed to give priority to pasture intake.
650 $aCOMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL
650 $aGANADO BOVINO
653 $aBEHAVIOUR
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aFREE-RANGE SYSTEMS
653 $aWELFARE
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aDALMAU, A.
700 1 $aESTELLÉS, F.
700 1 $aVILLAGRÁ, A.
773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2015, volume 56, Issue 10, pages 1683-1692.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
